基于現(xiàn)有的高校教師績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)中定性因素較多，采用層次分析法進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)又需檢驗(yàn)一致性的問(wèn)題，構(gòu)建教師績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的層次結(jié)構(gòu)模型以及定性與定量結(jié)合的綜合多因素評(píng)價(jià)。依據(jù)模糊層次分析法的思路，兼顧大學(xué)教師績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)，首先建立評(píng)價(jià)層次結(jié)構(gòu)模型，利用9標(biāo)度法構(gòu)造模糊一致矩陣，計(jì)算各指標(biāo)的相對(duì)權(quán)重，其次依據(jù)模糊評(píng)價(jià)方法和采用模型四算子構(gòu)造計(jì)算出高校教師定性定量的綜合多因素評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果。實(shí)例表明，該綜合評(píng)價(jià)能夠得到教師單獨(dú)某個(gè)指標(biāo)和綜合多指標(biāo)的定性定量評(píng)價(jià)，為高校教師的績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)問(wèn)題提供了參考。

　　Abstract:

　　This paper provides the qualitatively and quantitatively multi-factor evaluation after constructing the hierarchical structure model of college faculty performance evaluation for fear of inspection consistency problem with analytic hierarchy process. Firstly paper establishes evaluation the hierarchical structure model based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and the college faculty performance evaluation factors， constructs fuzzy consistency matrix using 9 scale methods， and calculates the corresponding weight. Secondly paper gets the qualitative and quantitative multi-actor evaluation of college faculty performance on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and four models. The example shows that college’s single performance evaluation and the comprehensive could be received by this evaluation model， which gives the reference for faculty evaluation.